Metropolitan

## Wednesday, August 29, 2007

### Why you don't want to code for a government department

Back in the mists of time, straight after my doctorate, I worked for a UK start-up called Madge Networks initially maintaining device drivers that implemented LLC, NetBIOS, IPX/SPX protocols and then writing a TCP/IP stack. Most of this work was done in C and assembler (x86 and TMS380).

When I first joined the company I was sent on an x86 assembly training course run by QA Training. (It rained on the first day and we were locked out so one of the company big cheeses ran over with QA Training umbrellas; to this day I use that umbrella).

During the course we were asked to write a simple function in C. I've forgotten what it was, but let's say it was a classic factorial function. I wrote something like:
unsigned int fac( unsigned int i ) {  if ( i < 2 ) {    return 1;  }  return i * fac( i - 1 );}

Later we looked at an assembly equivalent of the function, but before that I took at look at the person sitting next to me. His function looked like this:
unsigned int aq456( unsigned int aq457 ){  if ( aq457 == 0 )    return 1;  if ( aq457 == 1 )    return 1;  return aq457 * aq456( aq457 - 1 );}

So, naturally I asked him why he used such horrible names for functions and variables .

It turned out that he worked for a government department and all identifiers were allocated and documented before the code was written. Hence, somewhere a document would tell you that aq456 was a factorial function with excruciating detail of its parameters and return values. And also you could discover that aq457 was the parameter for aq456.

He recounted how each project had a unique two letter code (he'd chosen aq as being qa backwards) followed by a sequence number.

He'd chosen aq because all the projects had worked on were aa, ab, ac, ... the department had apparently never got past 26 projects.

I wonder why?

Labels:

If you enjoyed this blog post, you might enjoy my travel book for people interested in science and technology: The Geek Atlas. Signed copies of The Geek Atlas are available.

Josef said...

I'd say there are worse variable names... $data is rampant, for example. And then there's variable names where you can't tell if it's "l" (lover case ell) or "1" (one). if$counter_l == $counter_1: do_something() Or, even better,$shititsmidnightlouise .

--

The Banjo Players Must Die

5:59 PM
Tyson said...

Or, just as fun, the ubiquitous "tmp" variable that always somehow becomes part of production code.

9:43 PM
Christian Knott said...

Hey I was offered that job! Turned it down 'cos I wanted to work on the wicked cool (then) Windows 3.1.

Nearly 2 decades of hell later ...

12:43 AM
Peter said...

And then there's variable names where you can't tell if it's "l" (lover case ell) or "1" (one).

To be fair, that's at least as much your fault for coding with a font that makes that ambiguous. There are good, fixed-width fonts that handle potentially ambiguous characters well. I like monaco myself.

10:03 PM