Skip to main content

Geek Weekend, Day 1: Bletchley Park

Left to my own devices to the weekend I decided to embark on a Geek Weekend with visits to two places within easy reach of London. Today I visited Bletchley Park which is simply wonderful for any geek out there.

Bletchley Park is where the cryptanalysts of the Second World War worked in great secrecy (including Alan Turing) to break the Nazi German Enigma and Lorenz ciphers. To break them they used a combination of intimate knowledge of language, mathematics and machines.

Here's a Nazi German Enigma machine:



And here's a look inside one of the rotors inside an Enigma machine to see the wiring:



Two of the code breaking machines have been reconstructed. One is the Turing Bombe, an electromechanical machine made to break the Enigma cipher. Here's a look at the wiring in the back of the Bombe:



The other machine is the Colossus, a binary computer built to decipher Lorenz. Enigma is far more famous than Lorenz, but I have a soft spot for the Lorenz code because of its close relationship to modern cryptography. Here's a Lorenz machine:



While I was there I signed a large stack of copies of my book, The Geek Atlas. If you are at Bletchley Park and pop into the shop you'll be able to buy a signed copy if that's your thing. Of course, Bletchley Park, Enigma, Lorenz and the National Museum of Computing (also on site) are covered.

50p from every copy of The Geek Atlas goes to Bletchley Park (if the book is bought in the UK) and so the folks at Bletchley treated me to a special geek moment: a chance to meet Tony Sale who worked at MI-5 and reconstructed the Lorenz breaking machine Colossus. He took me round the back of the machine, and past the No Admittance sign to see it in operation. A geek treat if ever there was one.

The Lorenz code is essentially binary. Letters were transmitted using the Baudot Code which is a five-bit code. To encrypt the Lorenz machine created a pseudo-random sequence of Baudot codes and then XORed them with the message to be transmitted. If both transmitting and receiving machines generated the same pseudo-random sequence then the nice property of XOR that if you perform the same operation twice you get back to where you started. Thus XORing once with the pseudo-random sequence gave you the ciphertext to be transmitted, XORing again gave you back the original message.

Breaking this binary code was achieved with a binary computer. After giving me a behind-the-scenes look at Colossus, Tony Sale stood for a portrait in front of the machine:



And behind the machine is where the valve-action is:



Standing and see the Turing Bombe, staring into Turing's office in Hut 8, being taken around the back of Colossus by the man who put it back together, and getting to see more Enigmas, Lorenzs and Typexs than anyone could ask for made it a real treat.

The National Museum of Computing is Britain's answer to the wonderful Computer History Museum in Mountain View, CA. It contains many machines from the mainframe through the 8-bit era of British computing. All the machines are working or being restored. If you've never seen core memory, massive hard disk packs the size of washing machines, or just Commodore PET it's worth visiting (and it's right next door to Colossus).

Lastly, it's worth knowing that the National Museum of Computing despite being part of the ticket price to Bletchley Park actually receives no money from them. Please consider either donating money directly to them (I gladly emptied my pockets of change) or buying something in their shop.

And tomorrow it's a step back into the 19th century with a special visit to a place important in the life of Isambard Kingdom Brunel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of