Skip to main content

The world's simplest log file

Back when I was doing embedded programming we had a debugging feature called 'pokeouts'. The idea was that the program could write a single character to the screen when some important even occurred.

Now writing single characters to the screen might not seem like a good way to do debugging. After all, these days we've got tons of disk space and can spew log files out and our CPUs are not burdened. But in embedded programming you tend to have little space and little time.

This system worked by having code that resembled the following:

pokeout: LD AH, 0Eh
INT 10h
RET

And to make things even easier we actually implemented this by hooking an interrupt so that programs didn't need to know whether the pokeout facility was available. They could safely do INT xxh for debugging output. This meant that the logging facility could be loaded onto a running system.

It's amazing how much information you can convey with single characters scrolling across the screen. It's easy to get critical area entry and exit (we used lots of combinations of ( ) [ ] { } < > followed by single characters to identify the area). You can build on that to output hexadecimal numbers easily. And individual events can be hooked individual characters.

I'd spend my days looking at these scrolling screens of characters waiting for a program to crash. Everything was on the screen.

For some high-speed systems the screen pokeout was too slow. We replaced the routine above with code that wrote the pokeouts into a circular buffer in memory. When the program finally crashed the buffer could be examined using a high-powered debugger like SoftICE to give us a trace of the program's final moments. It was the equivalent of an aircraft's 'black box'.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to write a successful blog post

First, a quick clarification of 'successful'. In this instance, I mean a blog post that receives a large number of page views. For my, little blog the most successful post ever got almost 57,000 page views. Not a lot by some other standards, but I was pretty happy about it. Looking at the top 10 blog posts (by page views) on my site, I've tried to distill some wisdom about what made them successful. Your blog posting mileage may vary. 1. Avoid using the passive voice The Microsoft Word grammar checker has probably been telling you this for years, but the passive voice excludes the people involved in your blog post. And that includes you, the author, and the reader. By using personal pronouns like I, you and we, you will include the reader in your blog post. When I first started this blog I avoid using "I" because I thought I was being narcissistic. But we all like to read about other people, people help anchor a story in reality. Without people your bl

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of