Skip to main content

Monte Carlo simulation of One Banana, Two Banana to develop a card counting strategy

The children's game One Banana, Two Banana is a high stakes game of probability theory in action. Or something like that. Actually, it's a fun game where you have to take probability into account when deciding what to do.

Conceptually, the game is simple. There are 54 cards of five types. Three of the card types have bananas on them (one, two or three bananas), one card type has a banana skin on it and one card type has a swamp on it. All the cards are placed face down on the table and shuffled about. Each player takes turns at turning over as many cards as they want.

The total distance they move on the board (winning is a simple first past the post system) is the sum of the number of bananas on the banana cards. But if they pick a banana skin card then they stop picking cards and must reverse direction by the sum of the number of bananas on the banana cards. The swamp card simply stops a turn without a penalty.

There are six banana skin cards to start with and as they are removed from the pack they are placed on a special card for all to see. At every stage everyone knows the number of banana skin cards remaining. Thus you can adjust your strategy based on the number of banana skins that have caused others to go back.

So I wrote a little program that simulates One Banana, Two Banana games (or at least board positions) and see what the expected score is depending on the number of cards that the player chooses to pick. I assume a very simple strategy of deciding up front how many cards to pick. A more complexity strategy would be to look at the score as the player turns over cards and decide when to quit.

First, here's the code:

# Monte Carlo simulation of One Banana, Two Banana
# Copyright (c) 2010 John Graham-Cumming
# For game details see
# In the game there are a total of 54 cards of five types:
# 14 cards with three bananas on them
# 14 cards with two bananas on them
# 14 cards with one banana on them
# 6 cards with a swamp on them
# 6 cards with a banana skin
# The cards are placed face down on the table. At each turn the
# player can take as many cards as they wish. If they turn over a
# swamp or banana skin card they must stop; otherwise they stop when
# they choose.
# The total number of bananas is added up (call it X). If the banana
# skin card was turned over then the player moves BACK X spaces, if
# not the player moves FORWARD X spaces.
# Players have perfect knowledge of the state of the cards as they are
# placed face up once drawn. Once all six banana skin cards have be
# drawn the cards are all placed face down on the table again.

# The simulation runs through all the possible card positions and
# plays a large number of random draws for each possible number of
# cards a player might draw. It then keeps track of the score for a
# number of different card counting scenarios.
# Card counting scenarios:
# Number of skins: the player only keeps track of the number of banana
# skins that are on the table.
# Number banana cards: the player calculates the number of banana
# cards on the table.
# Number of three bananas: the player keeps track of the number of
# high scoring three banana cards on the table.

use strict;
use warnings;

# This is a two dimensional array. The first dimension is the number
# of skins (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). The second dimension is the number of
# cards the player will pick. Each entry is a hash with keys score
# (the total score of all trials) and count (the total number of
# trials).

my @skins;

# Similar arrays to @skins, but here the first dimension is the number
# of cards on the table of the specific type.

my @bananas;
my @threes;

# Generate all possible valid board positions using nested loops.
# Note that the skin cards can never be zero because that's when the
# board resets.
# There are 6 x 7 x 15 x 15 x 15 possible board positions (115,248).

for my $sk (1..6) {
for my $sw (0..6) {
for my $on (0..14) {
for my $tw (0..14) {
for my $th (0..14) {

# Arbitrarily chosen run of 100 plays

for my $sim (0..99) {

# Allow the player to pick up to 10 cards

for my $to_pick (1..10) {

# The state of the board at any time can be represented by
# a 5-tuple (Skin, Swamp, One, Two, Three) giving the
# number of cards of each type present on the playing
# board. The initial state is (6, 6, 14, 14, 14).

my @cards = ( $sk, $sw, $on, $tw, $th );

my $score = 0;
for my $pick (1..$to_pick) {
my $total = $cards[0] + $cards[1] + $cards[2] + $cards[3]
+ $cards[4];
my $picked = int(rand($total));
if ( $picked < $cards[0] ) {
$score = -$score;
} elsif ( $picked < ( $cards[0] + $cards[1] ) ) {
} elsif ( $picked < ( $cards[0] + $cards[1] + $cards[2] ) ) {
$score += 1;
} elsif ( $picked < ( $cards[0] + $cards[1] + $cards[2] +
$cards[3] ) ) {
$score += 2;
} else {
$score += 3;

$skins[$sk][$to_pick]{score} += $score;

$bananas[$on+$tw+$th][$to_pick]{score} += $score;

$threes[$th][$to_pick]{score} += $score;
print "$sk\n";

if ( open F, ">skins.csv" ) {
for my $i ( 1..6 ) {
for my $k (1..10) {
print F "$i,$k,$skins[$i][$k]{score},$skins[$i][$k]{count}\n";
close F;

And here's a chart showing the average score from the Monte Carlo simulation for each of the six possible numbers of banana skins on the board. The X axis shows the number of cards picked (or desired to be picked), and the Y axis the average score.

If you look just at the maximum scores for each of the banana skin counts, then a simple pattern emerges.

Banana SkinsOptimum Number of CardsExpected Score

So, just memorize that pattern and you'll be a better player. And also, if you are player and have exceeded the expected score with fewer than the recommended cards you'll know it's best to stop. I've removed that sentence because it is not correct. That's a different strategy based on stopping based on the cards you have already turned over; that deserves a separate analysis to find the best strategy.

Watch out Vegas, here I come.


Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of