Skip to main content

Calculating, rather than experimenting to find, resistor values for the NTX2 voltage divider

A previous blog post showed the voltage divider circuit I'm using to drive the Radiometrix NTX2 transmitter in GAGA-1. And another blog post gave a spreadsheet for working out the voltages based on resistor values.

What you really want, though, is a way to say "given this required frequency shift what should the resistor values be?". Recall the circuit diagram I was using.
Arduino                         Radio
7 ---27K--------------\
                       ---------- TX
8 ---22K----2K2-------/
Now, replace the specific resistances on the left with R1 and R2 and the input impedance to ground with 100K (the value from the datasheet):
Arduino                      Radio
7 ---R1--------------\
8 ---R2--------------/
Pins 7 and 8 are connected to either 5V or Gnd to make the divider so you have two configurations:
Arduino                      Radio
5V  ---R1--------------\
Gnd ---R2--------------/

Gnd ---R1--------------\
5V  ---R2--------------/
In both cases you can see that one of R1 or R2 is in parallel with the 100K input impedance so the dividers look like (I've used || to indicate the resistances in parallel):
5V  ---R1--------------X----------R2||100K---Gnd

5V  ---R2--------------X----------R1||100K---Gnd
Where the X is the connection to the TX pin and hence where we need specific voltages. For a 425Hz shift the difference between the two voltages needs to be 3/5000*425 (since the NTX2 has a deviation of 5kHz driven by a 0 to 3V value). Thus you can derive the following formula for the difference between the two voltages.

This simplifies to the following when you assume that R1 and R2 are positive (they are resistors after all!)

And that's a rather simple formula relating the resistances. Here's a graph of it (all resistance values are in k).

The cross hairs there correspond to one 22K resistor and another at about 24K2. Of course, if the input impedance isn't precisely 100K this isn't going to work, but the general method will.


Popular posts from this blog

How to write a successful blog post

First, a quick clarification of 'successful'. In this instance, I mean a blog post that receives a large number of page views. For my, little blog the most successful post ever got almost 57,000 page views. Not a lot by some other standards, but I was pretty happy about it. Looking at the top 10 blog posts (by page views) on my site, I've tried to distill some wisdom about what made them successful. Your blog posting mileage may vary. 1. Avoid using the passive voice The Microsoft Word grammar checker has probably been telling you this for years, but the passive voice excludes the people involved in your blog post. And that includes you, the author, and the reader. By using personal pronouns like I, you and we, you will include the reader in your blog post. When I first started this blog I avoid using "I" because I thought I was being narcissistic. But we all like to read about other people, people help anchor a story in reality. Without people your bl

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of