Skip to main content

GAGA-1: Voiding the warranty (for great justice!)

Having dug out and insulated the hole for the camera that will fly on GAGA-1 there was one last camera-related task to perform: make sure that it didn't move during the flight.

If you've seen any videos of other high-altitude balloon projects you'll know that there's quite a lot of buffeting of the capsule (especially in the jet stream) and so the camera needs to be fixed in place.

I had been planning to use strong Velcro mounts but after shaking the capsule around it was obvious that the camera was going to move around and the pictures would be spoilt. So, Plan B.

Plan B is a M6 nylon threaded rod that pierces the capsule wall and holds the camera in place with nuts. To do that a suitable 6mm hole needs to be drilled in the camera itself.

I dismantled my spare Canon A560 (the one that's partly broken) to see where I could drill. It was pretty obvious that the safest place was right through the view finder from the front. There are no electronics in the way. The view finder is a self-contained unit with plastic lenses. (A note of caution: the flash in the camera stores a lot of voltage in a small capacitor. Touch it and you'll get a big shock. I found that out the hard way.)

So, I first drilled a guide hole through the camera using a 2mm drill straight through the middle of the view finder lens on the front:

Next I used a 6mm drill to complete the hole. There was a load of debris inside the camera (contained within the view finder housing) that I removed using very thin pliers (it was the mangled guts of the view finder).

Then a quick check that the hole was good by threading through the M6 rod:

And then it was just a matter of making an appropriate hole in the capsule wall and pushing through the rod. To make sure it doesn't move there's a nut and the whole thing is hot glued in place.

And here's the finished mounting. The camera is held snugly in place.

A similar arrangement is used to hold the board containing the computers in place:

In other news, I've ordered one of the final bits that I didn't have: the parachute. It's a 36" parachute from Spherachutes with the balloon option (a point on the top where it can be attached to the line going to the balloon). It weighs just 50g but should slow the capsule for a safe landing.

Since Spherachutes makes them to order I've chosen alternating neon green and black panels. Neon green so that it can easily be seen on the ground, and black to find it in the sky.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of