Skip to main content


Last April I sent a weather balloon up into the stratosphere after months of preparation. You can read all the details starting here. I called the flight GAGA-1. Well, it's time for a GAGA-2.

Since last April I've done a number of experiments with expanding foam to see if it would make a viable material for the GAGA-2 capsule. Summary: no. It's too hard to work with, it doesn't insulate that well and I can get a cheap polystyrene capsule that's much smaller than the GAGA-1 capsule.

So, GAGA-2 will aim for a spring time 2012 flight with a number of changes from GAGA-1. First, a much smaller, lighter capsule. Second, video cameras rather than still. Third, no backup GSM based tracker.

Here's the new capsule. It's made from a pair of hollow polystyrene spheres that fit one inside the other.

These are very, very light. Weighing in at a total of 68g (compare that to GAGA-1's capsule that weighed more than 200g).

The inner sphere is covered in the same mylar film that was inside GAGA-1, and the outside is painted the same fluorescent yellow covered that proved so successful when recovering GAGA-1 (it was visible over 400m away through trees).

For comparison here's the GAGA-1 flown capsule next to the newly painted GAGA-2 capsule.

GAGA-2 will use the same parachute (GAGA-1 was actually a bit heavy for the size and the descent should be a little more graceful this time) and rigging as GAGA-1.

The GAGA-1 camera will be replaced by two tiny HD video cameras (this type). One will record the view and the other the balloon hoping to get video of the balloon bursting at altitude. They are much smaller than the GAGA-1 camera and each weights just 18g (whereas the GAGA-1 camera weighed 215g).

New UKHAS guidelines aimed at improved safety ask that "Antenna elements that face down should be flexible - avoid metal rods." GAGA-1's antenna was pretty stiff having been made out of a cut up coat hanger. So in keeping with the guidelines I've made a new antenna of the same 1/4 wave design out of Ikea drinking straws and copper wire salvaged from this project.

The flight computer is the same one that flew on GAGA-1 with a couple of modifications. GAGA-2 will fly without the external temperature sensor, I've added a direct power connection as space is tight and there wasn't room for the large connector used in GAGA-1 and I've added a strap to hold the piece together (GAGA-1 saw some pretty violent shaking while flying). I'm also using a single 9V battery. One of the failures in GAGA-1 was that the AA batteries became dislodged on landing causing the flight computer to lose power.

I've run a couple of battery life tests using standard 9V batteries. A really cheap and nasty Panasonic 6F22 only managed to power the flight computer for about 90 minutes before dying completely. A Duracell 6LR61 ran the flight computer for 17921 seconds (4 hours 58 minutes 41 seconds). On the day I'll actually be using a lithium battery because of their low temperature performance. Specifically, Energizer Advanced Lithium 9V which will work down to -40C (technical data sheet is here).

One important test is to see how the temperature drops inside the capsule (as I did for GAGA-1). So I placed the completed capsule inside the freezer and measured the temperature inside every 15 minutes.

The temperature drop seems acceptable with expected internal temperatures around -10C (ignoring the fact that there will be internal heating from the radio transmitter).

I'm using the same GPS module as GAGA-1 (a Lassen IQ) which is tiny, but this time I'm using an embedded antenna that will be inside the capsule on top of the Mylar film. Tests show that this work well. From a totally cold start I had a GPS lock in 115s in my back garden.

Next steps for GAGA-2 are:

1. Rewire the cameras so they use a larger external battery to get enough filming life. Then freeze them to see if they still operate at low temperatures. Then mount them.

2. Take the capsule out for a transmission test to make sure that the antenna is good enough.

3. Wait for a calm day for launch.


carlosreif said…
I wish you success
carlosreif said…
I wish you success
Clint Laskowski said…
This is so cool. I never thought about launching a balloon (but I've been into model rockets for years), but your extensive write-ups are making me reconsider. It must be very exciting to recover the capsule and see the data and images (and this time, movies) for the first time. Best of success on your GAGA-2 mission!
Kevin Vermeer said…
You could probably cut the weight of your flight control computer to half or less of the current weight by creating a custom PCB. Ditch stuff like the USB and power connectors and circuitry, the shield headers and receptacles, the prototype PCB, the big DIP used on the Arduino. Replace these with a QFP or QFN ATmega and SMD passives, and your entire "flight computer" could be just a couple inches square and much thinner. The Arduino isn't designed for low weight!

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of