Skip to main content

The greatest Google Mail feature you may not be using

There's a wonderfully powerful and subtle technique in Google Mail that can be used to enhance every reply you make to a mail: if you select an area of a message and then hit Reply only the selected text will be quoted in the response.

For example, here's an email I need to reply to:

If I simply hit Reply then the entire original message is quoted in the response:

But if I first select the piece that's important to me:

And then hit reply, only that part is in the response:

Use this to respond to just the right parts of a message and cut down those enormous chains of replies where the messages grow and grow and grow.

PS This feature has been disabled by default in Google Mail. You must enable it to use it.

Comments

Unknown said…
Seems like an important email. Are you sure you want to share it with the rest of the World?
Rod Salazar said…
That's a nigerian scam email
Rod Salazar said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
Also works the same way in the Mail.app on OSx
Unknown said…
This is the worst feature ever. I often accidentally select some letters. When hitting reply the whole quotet text gets lost.
Unknown said…
@Paul - How do you "accidentally select some letters"? I'm sorry if you're not very good with a mouse or you have a weird faulty trackpad, but that doesn't make this a bad feature. For those of us who use Gmail day in and day out for a huge volume of email this is a tremendously useful feature.
Anonymous said…
Wow; this is really incredible!
Desktop emailers should implement this!

Wait a second...
SpamKids said…
I don't like this feature because I usually select the text to read it. :)
bunwich said…
This feature has been available in Thunderbird for a while.
Dogsbody said…
Yeah, this has been in Thunderbird a while and does trip me up every now and then as I tend to highlight text as I read big paragraphs.
Kris Linquist said…
OS X's Mail application does this as well.
Bob Foster said…
Using a scam email as an example of how to selectively quote in your reply seems in bad taste. No one should reply to a scam email.
Unknown said…
@Paul Albrecht
Ditto. Same thing in thunderbird, always.
Unknown said…
Sometimes i select to copy dates, keywords or other material. Sometimes i just select words or text i am thinking about. Maybe im "not good with my mouse" when reading.
Im doing a LOT of emails and this does happen a few times a day.
My mailclient Sparrow does this too, and its really bad that its not optional.
Ok, the feature/idea is not bad but the implementation is.
Unknown said…
HackerNews Poll on selecting text while reading:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4839436
Unknown said…
I use this feature all the time. Earlier this week I upgraded to the new compose window and it completely removes this functionality. I ended up reverting back to the original view.
Pras said…
I was really amused when I found that Outlook did that. Really handy feature.
Lighton Phiri said…
Mozilla Thunderbird has that feature as well. I had no idea it could be done in GMail.
is it applicable for Forward also ?
Anonymous said…
Quoting is still not quite optimal in gmail. For once, it continues the sad trend of making top-posting the email standard. Started by the inane quoting of Outlook, where you didn't have line-prefixes. Google has those, so it should at least give the option of properly starting below the quoted text.

Also, I always find manually deleting quoted text to be quite iffy, due to the quote-char (">") to colored line conversion. Often a line or paragraph ends up unquoted if you delete the wrong character, and the only way back is undo. Makes trimming quoted text and replying to individual parts below them (as is the One True Way) a bit difficult.
Unknown said…
Note that this doesn't work with the new compose view, which I beta'd for a few days. It also hides the text you've quoted *while* you're writing the email, which just seems like a terrible idea.

Still, it's better than Zimbra, which only lets you top-post, and doesn't even wrap lines correctly in the quoted text.
Tom.Gamma said…
I've been looking for some time for thoughtful discussion regarding Reply With History. Certainly your selection technique helps, but I wonder... is even that chunk of history needed?

If a reply is prompt, has a relevant subject line, and contains complete sentences, you don't need any history.

The "complete sentences" part is the key. Instead of requiring the reader to constantly switch contexts between the history and your reply to form a coherent thought, just write a coherent sentence instead.

I suppose I am old and cranky, steeped in many years of exchanging paper letters. The idea of receiving a copy of my original letter with the reply written on it would have been considered rude. Ok. I know things have changed.
Unknown said…
The big question is: was this a lab feature until very recently? Since everybody started talking about it just now, and I have been using it as long as I can remember.
Unknown said…
Me 2. This way the New compose Window is completely unusable.
joe said…
Looks like this feature stopped working and no longer appears in gmail labs :-(
Unknown said…
Can anyone guide me what is Error code 535 and Error code 559 in email services? getting some information from Google Support. Anyone give me some more information related to this errors.

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

How to write a successful blog post

First, a quick clarification of 'successful'. In this instance, I mean a blog post that receives a large number of page views. For my, little blog the most successful post ever got almost 57,000 page views. Not a lot by some other standards, but I was pretty happy about it. Looking at the top 10 blog posts (by page views) on my site, I've tried to distill some wisdom about what made them successful. Your blog posting mileage may vary. 1. Avoid using the passive voice The Microsoft Word grammar checker has probably been telling you this for years, but the passive voice excludes the people involved in your blog post. And that includes you, the author, and the reader. By using personal pronouns like I, you and we, you will include the reader in your blog post. When I first started this blog I avoid using "I" because I thought I was being narcissistic. But we all like to read about other people, people help anchor a story in reality. Without people your bl

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of