Skip to main content

How to fix a corrupted JavaScriptCore.framework on Mac OS X 10.7.5

If /System/Library/Framework/JavaScriptCore.framework gets deleted or corrupted on Mac OS X you are in serious trouble. You can't run a browser, you can't start Preview, and more. But restoring it is possible.

To save anyone else the pain of figuring this stuff out here's how I got myself out of this situation. This blog post is boring until you have this problem and end up here because you searched for a solution. Welcome!

First you need to find the 'Client Combo' from Apple for your operating system. In my case that was the OS X Lion Update 10.7.5 (Client Combo). It contains a fresh copy of the JavaScriptCore.framework that just requires extracting and copying into place. Note that you can't just install the combo from the .dmg file because the Apple package manager relies on JavaScriptCore.framework. You have to do everything at the terminal.

Step 1. Download the combo and get it on your machine. For that you need to open Terminal (which you can get via Spotlight as it will still work) and type:

curl -L > MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.dmg

That will create a file called MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.dmg.

Step 2. Extract the pkg file from inside the dmg. To do this you need to mount it (as it is a volume) by typing

hdiutil attach MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.dmg

This should result in the contents being available in  /Volumes/Mac OS X 10.7.5 Update Combo. So change to that directory:

cd "/Volumes/Mac OS X 10.7.5 Update Combo"

And you'll find a single file in there: MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.pkg.

Step 3. Extract the contents of the pkg file by typing:

pkgutil --expand MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.pkg ~/combo

That will extract it into a directory called combo in your home. Go there with

cd ~/combo

Step 4. In that directory you'll find a directory called MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.pkg, the JavaScriptCore.framework is in there but needs further extracting like this

cat MacOSXUpdCombo10.7.5.pkg/Payload | gzip -d - | cpio -im

There will now be a System directory which contains the framework needed. Delete the corrupt one and copy the new one into place:

cd System/Library/Frameworks/
sudo rm -rf /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaScriptCore.framework
sudo cp -R JavaScriptCore.framework/ /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaScriptCore.framework

and you should be fixed.


Roberto said…
Thanks! Worked for my MacBook Air running Mountain Lion 10.8.3.
Roberto said…
Thanks! Worked for my MacBook Air, Mountain Lion 10.8.3.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
For OS X 10.8.3, the relevant update combo is found on .
Unknown said…
The new Payload (in OS X 10.8.3) is encrypted with bzip2, not gzip. The flag to extract is the same, so just s/gzip/bzip2/ above.
Geoff said…
For OS X 10.9.5, the URL is:
for OS X 10.10.1, the URL is:

And, as Fredrik Carlén commented, bzip2 must now be used rather than gzip.
Geoff said…
For other versions of OS X:

1. Visit (note: loads slowly!).
2. Select "Downloads in other languages" if applicable.
3. Select "Browse by Product" -> "Mac OS".
4. Scroll down until you find the correct "OS X Update".
5. Click "Load more results" if not found.
6. Often there will be an "Update" and "Update (Combo)" version. If so, select the Combo version.
7. Select "Download".
8. Restore /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaScriptCore.framework as described in the post. Use bzip2 rather than gzip for more recent versions.
9. You may want to (re)apply subsequent security updates in case one applies to the the JavaScriptCore.framework. You may have noticed these as you looked for the correct update, as the site appears to be in reverse chronological order. Apply security updates in the correct order.
Unknown said…
I have tried to repair my 10.6.8 using the info. Problem is that there is no Payload file in the 10.6.8 combo file. Can I use 10.7.5 to do the repair?

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of