Skip to main content

Some Pig

In the past I've written about writing. In my previous blog post I recommended three books:
On Writing Well, by William Zinsser. This book is an example of its own title. It's a delightfully well written book about writing that reads with the slippery ease of a Malcolm Gladwell. It's both enjoyable and informative. 
The AP Manual of Style. Although the AP book is about writing for newspapers it is full of useful advice about clarity. The fight for clarity is at the heart of non-fiction. Your goal is not to delight the reader with the breadth of your vocabulary, but to inform them about a subject in which you are claiming to be knowledgeable. News writing has to aim to be succinct, accessible and accurate; those are all good attributes for any non-fiction writing. 
The Elements of Style, by Strunk and White. The surprising thing about Strunk and White is that I can pick it up after years and years of owning it and rediscover its lessons. If you only buy one book from my list buy this one.
The fourth book I'd recommend isn't actually about writing, but reading it is a lesson in writing. The book is Charlotte's Web. If you've read or heard of Charlotte's Web you are likely wondering why I'm recommending children's fiction when the subject is writing. There's a simple reason.

Charlotte's Web was written by E. B. White: the White in Strunk and White.

If you read Charlotte's Web and think about the writing you'll notice that many of the lessons from The Elements of Style are clearly illustrated. The book is a pleasure to read as an adult despite being aimed at children.

The words are small and appropriate. The sentences clear and the prose flows easily. I think Charlotte's Web epitomizes a style that many writers should emulate no matter for whom they are writing. The actual subject of the book is quite difficult for children to digest, but White's writing makes them swallow a difficult tale with ease.

The clearest example of Strunk and White style is illustrated by the spider Charlotte. Writing in her web she's restricted by space and her own ability to form words. Yet she saves the pig's life by writing SOME PIG. Just two simple words express what's essential: this isn't just any pig. This is Wilbur.

When the reader first meets Charlotte she greets Wilbur with "Salutations". Wilbur doesn't understand the word and Charlotte is forced to explain:
"Salutations are greetings," said the voice. "When I say 'salutations', it's just my fancy way of saying hello or good morning. Actually, it's a silly expression, and I am surprised that I used it at all. [...]"
Charlotte seems to be echoing Strunk and White's command to 'Avoid fancy words'.

So, if you are writing something you hope others will read, remember the simplest of all writing rules: SOME PIG.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your last name contains invalid characters

My last name is "Graham-Cumming". But here's a typical form response when I enter it: Does the web site have any idea how rude it is to claim that my last name contains invalid characters? Clearly not. What they actually meant is: our web site will not accept that hyphen in your last name. But do they say that? No, of course not. They decide to shove in my face the claim that there's something wrong with my name. There's nothing wrong with my name, just as there's nothing wrong with someone whose first name is Jean-Marie, or someone whose last name is O'Reilly. What is wrong is that way this is being handled. If the system can't cope with non-letters and spaces it needs to say that. How about the following error message: Our system is unable to process last names that contain non-letters, please replace them with spaces. Don't blame me for having a last name that your system doesn't like, whose fault is that? Saying "Your

All the symmetrical watch faces (and code to generate them)

If you ever look at pictures of clocks and watches in advertising they are set to roughly 10:10 which is meant to be the most attractive (smiling!) position for the hands . They are actually set to 10:09.14 if the hands are truly symmetrical. CC BY 2.0 image by Shinji I wanted to know what all the possible symmetrical watch faces are and so I wrote some code using Processing. Here's the output (there's one watch face missing, 00:00 or 12:00, because it's very boring): The key to writing this is to figure out the relationship between the hour and minute hands when the watch face is symmetrical. In an hour the minute hand moves through 360° and the hour hand moves through 30° (12 hours are shown on the watch face and 360/12 = 30). The core loop inside the program is this:   for (int h = 0; h <= 12; h++) {     float m = (360-30*float(h))*2/13;     int s = round(60*(m-floor(m)));     int col = h%6;     int row = floor(h/6);     draw_clock((r+f)*(2*col+1), (r+f)*(row*2+1),

The Elevator Button Problem

User interface design is hard. It's hard because people perceive apparently simple things very differently. For example, take a look at this interface to an elevator: From flickr Now imagine the following situation. You are on the third floor of this building and you wish to go to the tenth. The elevator is on the fifth floor and there's an indicator that tells you where it is. Which button do you press? Most people probably say: "press up" since they want to go up. Not long ago I watched someone do the opposite and questioned them about their behavior. They said: "well the elevator is on the fifth floor and I am on the third, so I want it to come down to me". Much can be learnt about the design of user interfaces by considering this, apparently, simple interface. If you think about the elevator button problem you'll find that something so simple has hidden depths. How do people learn about elevator calling? What's the right amount of